The deadline was looming for the "Green Streak," the afternoon
edition of the Chicago Tribune, and the frenzied atmosphere in
the newsroom was carbonated with activity. Teletypes clattered behind
Plexiglas partitions. Copy boys darted from desk to desk. Reporters
hunched over their typewriters in intense concentration. Editors
barked into telephones. On the wall, a huge clock counted down the
A copy boy hustled into the cavernous room and tossed three
copies of the Chicago Daily News, hot off the presses, onto the middle
of the city desk. Assistant city editors lunged at them and hungrily
scanned the front page to see if the competition had beaten them
on anything. One of them let out a grunt. In one motion, he ripped out
an article and then pivoted, waving it in the face of a reporter who had
made the mistake of hovering too closely.
"Recover this!" he demanded. Without looking at it, the reporter
grabbed the scrap and headed for his desk to quickly make some
phone calls so he could produce a similar story.
Reporters at City Hall, the Criminal Courts Building, the State of
Illinois Building, and Police Headquarters were phoning assistant city
editors to "dope" their stories. Once the reporters had provided a
quick capsule of the situation, the assistants would cover their phone
with a hand and ask their boss, the city editor, for a decision on how
the article should be handled.
"The cops were chasing a car and it hit a bus," one of them called
over to the city editor. "Five injured, none seriously."
The city editor frowned. "Gimme a four-head," came the order-code
for a three-paragraph story.
"Four head," the assistant repeated into the phone. He pushed a
button to connect the reporter to a rewrite man, who would take down
details on a typewriter and then craft the item in a matter of minutes.
The year was 1974. I was a rookie, just three months out of the
University of Missouri's school of journalism. I had worked on smaller
newspapers since I was fourteen, but this was the big leagues. I was
already addicted to the adrenaline.
On that particular day, though, I felt more like a spectator than a
participant. I strolled over to the city desk and unceremoniously
dropped my story into the "in" basket. It was a meager offering-a
one-paragraph "brief" about two pipe bombs exploding in the south
suburbs. The item was destined for section three, page ten, in a journalistic
trash heap called "metropolitan briefs." However, my fortunes
were about to change.
Standing outside his glass-walled office, the assistant managing
editor caught my attention. "C'mere," he called.
I walked over. "What's up?"
"Look at this," he said as he handed me a piece of wire copy. He
didn't wait for me to read it before he started filling me in.
"Crazy stuff in West Virginia," he said. "People getting shot at,
schools getting bombed-all because some hillbillies are mad about
the textbooks being used in the schools."
"You're kidding," I said. "Good story."
My eyes scanned the brief Associated Press report. I quickly noticed
that pastors were denouncing textbooks as being "anti-God" and that
rallies were being held in churches. My stereotypes clicked in.
"Christians, huh?" I said. "So much for loving their neighbors.
And not being judgmental."
He motioned for me to follow him over to a safe along the wall.
He twirled the dial and opened it, reaching in to grab two packets of
"Get out to West Virginia and check it out," he said as he handed
me the six hundred dollars of expense money. "Give me a story for
the bulldog." He was referring to the first edition of next Sunday's
paper. That didn't give me much time. It was already noon on Monday.
I started to walk away, but the editor grabbed my arm. "Look-be
careful," he said.
I was oblivious. "What do you mean?"
He gestured toward the AP story I was clutching. "These hillbillies
hate reporters," he said. "They've already beaten up two of them.
Things are volatile. Be smart."
I couldn't tell if the emotional surge I felt was fear or exhilaration.
In the end, it didn't really matter. I knew I had to do whatever it
would take to get the story. But the irony wasn't lost on me: these
people were followers of the guy who said, "Blessed are the peacemakers,"
and yet I was being warned to keep on guard to avoid getting
"Christians.," I muttered under my breath. Hadn't they heard,
as one skeptic famously put it, that modern science had already dissolved
Christianity in a vat of nitric acid?
IS DARWIN RESPONSIBLE?
From the gleaming office buildings in downtown Charleston to the
dreary backwood hamlets in surrounding Kanawha County, the situation
was tense when I arrived the next day and began poking around
for a story. Many parents were keeping their kids out of school; coal
miners had walked off the job in wildcat strikes, threatening to cripple
the local economy; empty school buses were being shot at; firebombs
had been lobbed at some vacant classrooms; picketers were
marching with signs saying, "Even Hillbillies Have Constitutional
Rights." Violence had left two people seriously injured. Intimidation
and threats were rampant.
The wire services could handle the day-to-day breaking developments
in the crisis; I planned to write an overview article that
explained the dynamics of the controversy. Working from my hotel
room, I called for appointments with key figures in the conflict and
then drove in my rental car from homes to restaurants to schools to
offices in order to interview them. I quickly found that just mentioning
the word "textbook" to anybody in these parts would instantly
release a flood of vehement opinion as thick as the lush trees that carpet
the Appalachian hillsides.
"The books bought for our school children would teach them to
lose their love of God, to honor draft dodgers and revolutionaries, and
to lose their respect for their parents," insisted the intense, dark-haired
wife of a Baptist minister as I interviewed her on the front porch
of her house. As a recently elected school board member, she was
leading the charge against the textbooks.
A community activist was just as opinionated in the other direction.
"For the first time," she told me, "these textbooks reflect real
Americanism, and I think it's exciting. Americanism, to me, is listening
to all kinds of voices, not just white, Anglo-Saxon Protestants."
The school superintendent, who had resigned at the height of the
controversy, only shook his head in disdain when I asked him what
he thought. "People around here are going flaky," he sighed. "Both
poles are wrong."
Meanwhile, ninety-six thousand copies of three hundred different
textbooks had been temporarily removed from classrooms and
stored in cardboard cartons at a warehouse west of Charleston. They
included Scott Foresman Co.'s Galaxy series; McDougal, Littel Co.'sMan series; Allyn & Bacon Inc.'s Breakthrough series; and such classics
as The Lord of the Flies, Of Human Bondage, Moby Dick, The Old
Man and the Sea, Animal Farm, and Plato's Republic.
What were people so angry about? Many said they were outraged
at the "situational ethics" propounded in some of the books. One textbook
included the story of a child cheating a merchant out of a penny.
Students were asked, "Most people think that cheating is wrong. Do you
think there is ever a time when it might be right? Tell when it is. Tell
why you think it is right." Parents seized on this as undermining the
Christian values they were attempting to inculcate into their children.
"We're trying to get our kids to do the right thing," the parent of
an elementary student told me in obvious frustration. "Then these
books come along and say that sometimes the wrong thing is the right
thing. We just don't believe in that! The Ten Commandments are the
But there was also an undercurrent of something else: an inchoate
fear of the future, of change, of new ideas, of cultural transformation.
I could sense a simmering frustration in people over how modernity
was eroding the foundation of their faith. "Many of the protesters,"
wrote the Charleston Gazette, "are demonstrating against a changing
This underlying concern was crystallized for me in a conversation
with a local businessman over hamburgers at a Charleston diner.
When I asked him why he was so enraged over the textbooks, he
reached into his pocket and took out a newspaper clipping about the
"Listen to what Dynamics of Language tells our kids," he said as
he quoted an excerpt from the textbook: "Read the theory of divine
origin and the story of the Tower of Babel as told in Genesis. Be prepared
to explain one or more ways these stories could be interpreted."
He tossed the well-worn clipping on the table in disgust. "Thetheory of divine origin!" he declared. "The Word of God is not a theory.
Take God out of creation and what's left? Evolution? Scientists
want to teach our kids that divine origin is just a theory that stupid
people believe but that evolution is a scientific fact. Well, it's not. And
that's at the bottom of this."
I cocked my head. "Are you saying Charles Darwin is responsible
for all of this?"
"Let me put it this way," he said. "If Darwin's right, we're just
sophisticated monkeys. The Bible is wrong. There is no God. And
without God, there's no right or wrong. We can just make up our morals
as we go. The basis for all we believe is destroyed. And that's why this
country is headed to hell in a handbasket. Is Darwin responsible? I'll
say this: people have to choose between science and faith, between
evolution and the Bible, between the Ten Commandments and make-'em-up-as-you-go
ethics. We've made our choice-and we're not
He took a swig of beer. "Have you seen the teacher's manual?"
he asked. I shook my head. "It says students should compare the Bible
story of Daniel in the Lion's Den to that myth about a lion. You know
which one I'm talking about?"
"Androcles and the Lion?" I asked, referring to the Aesop fable
about an escaped slave who removed a thorn from the paw of a lion he
encountered in the woods. Later, the recaptured slave was to be eaten
by a lion for the entertainment of the crowd at the Roman Coliseum,
but it turned out to be the same lion he had befriended. Instead of eating
him, the lion gently licked his hand, which impressed the emperor
so much that the slave was set free.
"Yeah, that's the one," the businessman said as he wagged a
french fry at me. "What does it tell our kids when they're supposed to
compare that to the Bible? That the Bible is just a bunch of fairy tales?
That it's all a myth? That you can interpret the Bible any way you darn
well please, even if it rips the guts out of what it really says? We've got
to put our foot down. I'm not going to let a bunch of eggheads destroy
the faith of my children."
I felt like I was finally getting down to the root of the controversy.
I scribbled down his words as well as I could. Part of me, though,
wanted to debate him.
Didn't he know that evolution is a proven fact? Didn't he realize
that in an age of science and technology that it's simply irrational to
believe the ancient myths about God creating the world and shaping
human beings in his own image? Did he really want his children clinging
desperately to religious pap that is so clearly disproved by modern
cosmology, astronomy, zoology, comparative anatomy, geology,
paleontology, biology, genetics, and anthropology?
I was tempted to say, "Hey, what is the difference between Daniel
in the Lion's Den and Androcles and the Lion? They're both fairy
tales!" But I wasn't there to get into an argument. I was there to report
the story-and what a bizarre story it was!
In the last part of the twentieth century, in an era when we had
split the atom and put people on the moon and found fossils that prove
evolution beyond all doubt, a bunch of religious zealots were tying a
county into knots because they couldn't let go of religious folklore. It
simply defied all reason.
I thought for a moment. "One more question," I said. "Do you ever
have any doubts?"
He waved his hand as if to draw my attention to the universe.
"Look at the world," he said. "God's fingerprints are all over it. I'm
absolutely sure of that. How else do you explain nature and human
beings? And God has told us how to live. If we ignore him-well, then
the whole world's in for a whole lot of trouble."
I reached for the check. "Thanks for your opinions," I told him.
STANDING TRIAL IN WEST VIRGINIA
All of this was good stuff for my story, but I needed more. The
leaders I had interviewed had all denounced the violence as being the
unfortunate actions of a few hotheads. But to tell the whole story, I
needed to see the underbelly of the controversy. I wanted to tap into
the rage of those who chose violence over debate. My opportunity
A rally, I heard, was being planned for Friday night over in the isolated,
heavily wooded community of Campbell's Creek. Angry parents
were expected to gather and vote on whether to continue to keep their
kids out of school. Tempers were at a boiling point, and the word was
that reporters were not welcome. It seemed that folks were incensed over
the way some big newspapers had caricatured them as know-nothing
hillbillies, so this was intended to be a private gathering of the faithful,
where they could freely speak their minds.
This was my chance. I decided to infiltrate the rally to get an
unvarnished look at what was really going on. At the time, it seemed
like a good idea.
I rendezvoused with Charlie, a top-notch photojournalist dispatched
by the Tribune to capture the textbook war on film. We
decided that we would sneak into the rural school where hundreds of
agitated protesters were expected to pack the bleachers. I'd scribble
my notes surreptitiously; Charlie would see whether he could snap a
few discreet photos. We figured if we could just blend into the crowd,
we'd get away with it.
We figured wrong.
Our shiny new rental car stood in sharp contrast with the dusty
pick-up trucks and well-used cars that were hastily left at all angles
on the gravel parking lot. We tried to be as inconspicuous as possible
as we walked nonchalantly beside the stragglers who were streaming
toward the gymnasium. Charlie kept his Nikons hidden beneath his
waist-length denim jacket, but there was no way he could conceal his
long black hair.